Learning resources published at JEM are reviewed in a way similar to Software and Services, but for a larger set of criteria.

A review will comprise an evaluation based on the following set of criteria. Each of them will require an overall score, 1-10 from "insufficient" to "excellent", and a short motivation of the score.

Clarity of learning objectives rates whether the resource specifies the learning goals clearly enough.

Credits to creators and license terms should be present.

Professional presentation rates the quality of grammar and spelling, design choices, use of fonts and of colors, and proper language.

Appropriate references evaluates the presence of bibliographic references and further materials for learners who wish to go deeper into a topic.

Appropriate use of technology evaluates whether the technologies used are the ones most suited to the task.

Accuracy of content rates the correctness of the content.

Adherence to stated learning objectives evaluates how well the resource accomplishes the stated learning objectives.

Clear identification of target learners aims to provide guidance in the intended user group for a resource.

Clarity of usage instructions measures the documentation for the end users, its clarity and coverage.

Effective/engaging use of technology considers whether the software implements an effective and/or engaging use of technology for learning and teaching mathematics.

Feedback opportunity/assessment support rates whether the resource provides enough feedback to the learner or/and a possibility to assess the learning process.

Availability of case studies should link if possible case studies or papers that document the relevance of the software or service as learning technology.

Identification of pre-requisites specifies whether necessary pre-requisites for an effective learning process using the resource are clearly stated. It does not refer to technical pre-requites.

Usability in learning environment aims to establish whether the software or service can be integrated in learning environments.

Ease of navigation/user interface rates the user interface design, its consistency, intuitive functionalities, and pleasant look and feel.

Accessibility evaluates the design in terms of differently able users.

Technical requirements documentation rates the installation pre-requisites and instructions.

Metadata accuracy rates the completeness and availability of standard metadata record for the resource.